FACELIFT.STUDIO

A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures after facial cosmetic surgery and/or nonsurgical facial rejuvenation

A review of 442 articles found 47 patient questionnaires on facial appearance after cosmetic procedures, but only 9 met inclusion criteria and none met all development and validation guidelines.

2009
Plast Reconstr Surg
144
Citations, NIH iCite
10
Authors
2
Topics

Overview

Patient satisfaction and quality of life define success in cosmetic surgery, yet few studies measure how patients see their appearance afterward. The authors searched the English-language literature for questionnaires designed to measure satisfaction or quality of life after surgical or nonsurgical facial cosmetic procedures. They checked each against international guidelines.

Findings

  • 442 articles reviewed; 47 patient-reported outcome measures on facial appearance after a cosmetic procedure identified.
  • 9 questionnaires met inclusion and exclusion criteria.
  • Rhinoplasty: Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation, Glasgow Benefit Inventory, Facial Appearance Sorting Test.
  • Skin rejuvenation: Facial Lines Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire, Skin Rejuvenation Outcomes Evaluation, Facial Lines Outcomes Questionnaire.
  • Facelift: Facelift Outcomes Evaluation.
  • Blepharoplasty: listed in the abstract as the Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation.
  • General appearance: Derriford Appearance Scale 59.
  • None met all guidelines; each was limited in its development, validation or content.

What it means for a patient

  • In 2009, no questionnaire fully met standards for measuring how patients feel about facial cosmetic results.
  • Only one facelift-specific questionnaire met the inclusion criteria, and it too fell short of the guidelines.
  • A surgeon's satisfaction numbers depend on how they were measured. Ask what tool was used.
  • The review covered English-language studies only.

Why this paper matters

It showed the gap in validated patient-reported outcome measures for facial cosmetic surgery. The authors call for a tool that meets accepted standards, to compare techniques and measure benefit in practice. Cited 144 times (NIH iCite, 2026-09-25).

Terms

  • Patient-reported outcome measure (PROM): a questionnaire a patient fills in about their own results.
  • Systematic review: a study that searches for and appraises all published research on a question.
  • Validation: testing that a questionnaire measures what it claims to.
  • Reliability: whether a questionnaire gives consistent results.
  • Responsiveness: whether a questionnaire detects real change after treatment.
  • Quality of life: how a condition or treatment affects daily life and well-being.
  • Blepharoplasty: eyelid surgery.

Newest papers on outcomes and longevity

From the PubMed facelift record, newest first.

2026
Comment on: Facelift surgery under local anesthesia: A scoping review of current practices and outcomes
Dupuy F, Despert H, Oubari H, Dinahet T, Boucher F, Henry G, et al. · Ann Chir Plast Esthet · PMID 42532689

More summaries on outcomes and longevity

2026
"Objectifying Outcomes in Facial Aesthetic Surgery Using Artificial Intelligence"
Rames JD, Lipinski A, Alameddine KO, Kreutz-Rodrigues L, Sinha K, Martinez-Jorge J, et al. · Plast Reconstr Surg · PMID 42658153
2026
Deep Plane Facelifts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes
Koroma P, Reji N, Burridge I, Shah M, Gopi P, Lee K, et al. · Aesthetic Plast Surg · PMID 42576065
2026
Two Endoscopic Surgical Approaches to Facial Rejuvenation: A Longitudinal Study on Safety and Patient Satisfaction
Chartier A, Kenny-Howell L, Gervais V, Haddad J · Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open · PMID 42565105